>>>>> "Goyal, Amit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should wait for 64*T1 and then terminate the session. No. Such wait is used only before first provisional response. Time for full INVITE transaction is not limited. See transaction state diagram and e.g. paragraph 13.3.1.1. >> What should be the behaviour of UAC in the below >>mentioned scenario >> >> "after sending an INVITE request , it will receive >>100 trying response , after that it will not receive >>any further responses." Such timeout is implementation-defined. There can be reason to wait for any time:), but in real some timeout shall be invented according to usage of this call. -- Valentin Nechayev PortaOne Inc., Software Engineer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
