Thanks for the clarification. Ok I am reframing the question: What are the major challenges for the mobile telco industry in adopting SIP as their choice for IMS?
I will be waiting for the answer. Thaks, Arnba On 8/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Arnab Biswas wrote: > > Hi Dale, > > > > Could you please elaborate... > > > > Arnab > > > > > > > > > SIP, when it was first conceived, was not intended to replace the PSTN > with an IP based alternative. The basic tenets of what SIP is is ... > "The initiation of sessions within a transport agnostic environment." > IMS, on the other hand is, "IP Multi-Media Sub-system". Taken > outside of the mobile telco/GSM context, this term will be a very vague > term. > > Would you rather reconstruct your Question to: > > "What are the major challenges for the mobile telco industry in adopting > SIP as their choice for IMS?" > > > > > On 8/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> From: "Arnab Biswas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> I am just curious to know what are the major challenges SIP is > >> going to face, specifically on its use in the IP Multimedia > >> Subsystem framework. > >> > >> Many people in the SIP community would say "The desire by the telcos > >> to replicate the architecture (and service provider control) of the > >> PSTN." > >> > >> Dale > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sip-implementors mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
