>>it is not comparable to forking scenario.
As I tried to explain in my e-mail, a UAS can do forking by itself
if it sends different to tags in its responses.
Though not usual, it is perfectly valid.
If the UAS sent these 2 responses without different to tags,
then the UAS is behaving wrongly.
Regards,
Attila
-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 November 2007 11:20
To: Attila Sipos; Brocha Strous; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] 180 with body AFTER 183 with body - is
itvalid
Inline ...
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Attila Sipos
>Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:34 AM
>To: Brocha Strous; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 180 with body AFTER 183 with body - is
>itvalid
>
>
>it is ok because this is what happens in forking scenarios.
I agree that it is ok for UAS to send 180 with sdp after 183 with sdp,
but it is not comparable to forking scenario. Because in case of forking
18xs coming from different forked endpoints will have different to-tags
and so each will have a separate early dialog with the UAC.
Sanjay
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
