Hello Everyone,

 

Please forgive me if this question has been asked before.

 

After reading RFC 3325, my understanding of the P-Asserted-Identity and
>From headers is the UAC should put the user's real identity in the
P-Asserted-Identity header and what the user wishes to appear in the
>From header.  I believe this is shown by the example in Section 10.1:

 

* F4   proxy.cisco.com -> proxy.pstn.net (trusted)

 

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0

Via: SIP/2.0/TCP useragent.cisco.com;branch=z9hG4bK-124

Via: SIP/2.0/TCP proxy.cisco.com;branch=z9hG4bK-abc

To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From: "Anonymous" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=9802748

Call-ID: 245780247857024504

CSeq: 2 INVITE

Max-Forwards: 69

P-Asserted-Identity: "Cullen Jennings" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

P-Asserted-Identity: tel:+14085264000

Privacy: id

 

Is this understanding correct?

 

Now imagine a user has two UACs registered in the system, UACA and UACB.
Each UAC has a different display name and AOR, "Steve UACA"
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and "Steve UACB" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  The
user makes a call from UACB, but wants it to appear as if it is coming
from UACA.  What should be in the P-Asserted-Identity and From headers?
Should it be:

 

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0

To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From: "Steve UACA" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=9802748

P-Asserted-Identity: "Steve UACB" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

 

Steve

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to