I promised I'll provide more background about the question I raised: It's a key telephone system. We live and breathe Shared Line Appearances. The system is fully-distributed with no central point of control, whatsoever. The system is comprised of tiny trunk cards (due to legacy reasons) that have now been converted to SIP UAs. The system is highly scalable and as result there can be hundreds of these SIP UA cards installed in a single system. These trunk cards are "created equal" - i.e. anyone of them can take you to the same extension (AoR). An AoR is registered with the Registrar/Proxy when a user logs-in. To hide the multiplicity of these SIP UA cards from the external world we've fronted them with a SIP Proxy Server. The proxy server load balances traffic to these line cards in some fashion.
-- Raj > -----Original Message----- > From: Raj Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 6:29 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; > '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Using domain names in Contact URI > > > You say "Our goal is to bind hundreds of Contact URIs to one AoR." > > without specifying what those contact URIs might be. Would it be > > possible to use one base URI but to create many different > derived URIs > > by adding a URI-parameter? > > Not really. Each Contact URI contains a distinct IP address. > They can not be derived by automata. That's why we need to > pre-configure the Registrar out-of-band. > > > In any case, if you want useful advice, you should describe more of > > the problem -- it is likely that determining a "good" > > solution requires understanding why you think you need to register > > hundreds of contacts for an AOR. Otherwise, all we can say > is "What > > you have suggested doesn't seem like it is going to work well." > > Fair. Let me write up a bit more about the problem. > > -- > Raj Jain _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
