Stephen,

  RFC 3263 Section 4.1 may answer your question. I quote
 "  If the URI specifies a transport protocol in the transport parameter,
   that transport protocol SHOULD be used."


Regards
Harsha

On 16/01/2008, Stephen Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Srini,
>
> It is also present in the Contact, Via and Request-Line and as I
> understand it, these are necessary requirements (well, if future
> communication is to be over TCP) but that's not the question.
>
> The question is, is it valid to have transport=tcp as a URI parameter in
> the To and From headers? Calls are being rejected on this basis. I can't
> find anything forbidding it although I will concede that it is rather
> unnecessary.
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krishnamoorthy Srini-A19809 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 January 2008 16:03
> To: Stephen Paterson; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Transport=tcp interop problem
>
>
>        Isn't the "Contact" header more appropriate for Uas to indicate
> the transport preference?  Contact headers turn into request-URIs on the
> way back and the proxies and UAs route on request-URIs/Route headers,
> right?. We would obviously use the Via headers to indicate TCP properly
> (SIP/2.0/TCP) in the forward direction - guess there is no question
> there.
>
> --
> Srini
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Stephen Paterson
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Transport=tcp interop problem
>
> Hi all,
>
> When using TCP, we place 'transport=tcp' in both the To and From headers
> and it is claimed that the presence of this in the From header is
> invalid (interestingly the To header is not causing any grief). It seems
> to me that the From and To headers contain URIs and transport=tcp is a
> valid URI parameter so there should be no problem.
>
> Can anyone clear this up as I can't find anything definitive in 3261?
> Reference to the RFCs would be most appreciated.
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve
>
>
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 
> 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
> P Please consider the environment and don't print this e-mail unless you 
> really need to
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>


-- 
Regards
Harsha
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to