Thanks a lot Manju, I really appreciate your quick response. Now got clear
picture.

-
Mahesh
GL Communication

On Jan 18, 2008 12:17 PM, Manjunath Warad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Mahesh,
>        Background: RFC 2543 supports strict routing and RFC 3261 supports
> loose routing. For the backward compatibility for RFC 3261 implementors
> that
> line is the guideline.
>
>        If lr is present in the route header then that entity supports
> loose
> routing else strict routing.
>
> Thumb Rule of strict route(SR):
>   Entity receiving a message with SR support MUST have its self address in
> the req-uri of SIP message otherwise it decline that message thinking its
> not intended for it.
>
>        Passage says how to process a request in case of 3261 Proxy before
> forwarding. Suppose you have 3 proxies
>
>    3261UAC                     3261Proxy1               2543Proxy2
> 3261Proxy3                      3261UAS
>  INVITE                                INVITE                  INVITE
> INVITE                  INVITE
>  Req-Uri:<sip:UAS;lr>        Req-Uri:<sip:P2>          Req-Uri:<sip:P3;lr>
> Req-Uri:<sip:UAS;lr>
>  Route:<sip:P1;lr>,            Route:<sip:P3;lr>,      Route:<sip:UAS;lr>
> <<No Route Header>>
>   <sip:P2>,<sip:P3;lr>          <sip:UAS;lr>
>
> Above example shows how the req-uri and route header of an INV message is
> handled in 3261 n 2543 based SIP entities.
>
> Hope this helps!!!
>
> regards,
> Manju
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> ***********
> This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
> which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
> but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
> dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
> prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> by
> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mahesh
> Pidshetti
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 11:33 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] [URGENT] Meaning of the Passage in
> ScriptSIP_CC_PR_MP_RQ_V_015
>
> Dear Sip Geeks,
>
> I am not understanding the clear picture of what the following means:
>
> "Ensure that the IUT on receipt of an INVITE request with a Route header,
> and the first URI of this Route does not contain a lr parameter, put the
> Request-URI into the last position of the Route header, and put the first
> value of the Route header into the Request-URI, and then forwards the
> message."
>
> Please assist me in this regard, its deadly require test case.
>
> Also If possible please give me a small script, just outline is
> sufficient.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
>
> -
> Mahesh
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to