That seemed to be the most logical way to me too, i'll do that way.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>    From: Ivar Lumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>    RFC 3263 5.
>
>    ....
>
>    If, however, the sent-by field contained a domain name and no port,
>    the server queries for SRV records at that domain name using the
>    service identifier "_sips" if the Via transport is "TLS", "_sip"
>    otherwise, and the transport from the topmost Via header ("TLS"
>    implies that the transport protocol in the SRV query is TCP).  The
>    resulting list is sorted as described in [2], and the response is
>    sent to the topmost element on the new list described there.  If that
>    results in a failure, the next entry on the list is tried.
>
>    This is last processing bullet and no more comments, from there comes my 
>    question:
>    If no SRV records ?
>    (Try domain with default port ? or generate transport error)
>
>    Any comment would be welcome.
>
> That does appear to be a bug in RFC 3263.  I assume that (in parallel
> with other cases) if an SRV lookup of the domain name fails, you then
> do an A/AAAA lookup.
>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>   

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to