El Monday 03 March 2008 09:46:44 Attila Sipos escribió:
> Hi,
>
> you might want to look at rfc 2119 ("Key words for use
> in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels")
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>
> 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
> may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
> particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
> carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
>
> So, it is recommended that a Date header is inserted
> and you can, if you like, use the information in that header to
> set an internal clock.
>
> But you don't have to do either.
>
> MUST > SHOULD > MAY
>
> ( I don't like SHOULD - if it's recommended, why not make things
> a MUST? I'm sure this would make things more interoperable!!
> But anyway... )
Thanks a lot, you are completely right.
BTW: Why not "RECOMMENDED" instead of "SHOULD"?? XDD
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
