Hi, Practically it seems to be MAY. I have checked many SIP stacks and they didn,t include Date header.
Regards, Sabyasachi On 3/3/08, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, I'm sure that "Date "header is not mandatory at all in the 200 OK to a > REGISTER. In fact I don0t know a registrar adding it. > > But RFC 3261 says: > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 10.3 Processing REGISTER Requests > > 8. The registrar returns a 200 (OK) response. The response MUST > contain Contact header field values enumerating all current > bindings. Each Contact value MUST feature an "expires" > parameter indicating its expiration interval chosen by the > registrar. The response SHOULD include a Date header field. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > But it also says: > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 10.2.5 Setting the Internal Clock > > If the response for a REGISTER request contains a Date header field, > the client MAY use this header field to learn the current time in > order to set any internal clocks. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > So? is that "Date" header a SHOULD or a MAY? > > > > > -- > Ińaki Baz Castillo > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > -- Regards, Sabyasachi Samal IMS Testing Solution Nethawk Networks India Pvt. Ltd. Bhubaneswar Orissa, India _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
