Thanks Harsha. My first question is about the purpose of Warning header. Can I user this Warning header only for specifying SDP related information?
Instead of Reason-Phrase, I want more systematic way. I want to assign warning code to each case and based on that warning code, our cutomized UA shows different UI to the user. Regards, Sumin. On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Harsha. R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sumin, > Just a thought. RFC 3261 does not impose restricitons on the > "Reason-Phrase" in the Status line of the SIP Response > In that case you can use that itself. > > Ex: > 504 <SDP <error> . > > The contents within <> can be chosen according to your need. > Ofcourse for this to be useful anywhere, the UA needs to look into > Reason-phrase as well. > > Hope this helps you. > > Regards > Harsha > > > On 04/03/2008, Sumin Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I have a question regarding Warning header. > > Here is a quote from rfc 3261. > > Warning codes provide information supplemental to the status code in > > SIP response messages when the failure of the transaction results > > from a Session Description Protocol (SDP) (RFC 2327 [1]) problem. > > > > Can I user Warning header only for SDP related information? > > For example, I want to send 504 Server-Timeout or 408 Request Time-out > > with > > more details like upstream server and external server info. > > If I can't use Warning header, which header will be good for this > > purpose? > > > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > > > Regards, > > Sumin > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > > > -- > Regards > Harsha _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
