El Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:41:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > Hi Iñaki, > > The custom headers are of interest to particular implementation. It depends > on how you interpret multiple custom header line with same header name. if > you process like list, it would be similar to list else overwritten with > last header value. AFAIK, 3261 does not mandate on custom headers. > > It would never be an issue for any intermediary entities, since they just > relay as it is or drop it completely based on the role they play (proxy, > b2bua, ...)
Ok, so I just will do the multi-header parsing for known headers using it (Via, Route...). Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
