Hi Attila,
I wonder if the following topology is invalid, in which case the forwarding
stateless proxy
can as well put the received information in Via header.
If UAS erases the received information then it would be impossible for the
proxy would send response to UAC.
UAC NAT1 Proxy NAT2 UAS
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Madhav
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> El Wednesday 26 March 2008 12:51:01 Nitin Arora escribió:
> > ya you are right I misinterpreted the question
> > and answered in hurry.
> > but Via is added by UAC, isn't it?
>
> In fact I'm just reading RFC 3261 and trying to solve my doubts, it wasn't
> a
> real case :)
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
