Very interesting this peer-to-peer presence mode ! I did not see this configuration option.
Of course all clients should be in the same mode I guess ? Gracias Iñaki -pascal On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Tuesday 01 April 2008 13:09:17 Pascal Maugeri escribió: > > Hi > > > > I've seen that my VoIP client X-Lite is sending NOTIFY request to > publish > > changes in its availability. I was expecting to see PUBLISH request > instead > > of NOTIFY ... > > > > Is it so that one could use NOTIFY instead of PUBLISH request ? > > No, PUBLISH is to inform a presence server about our state. > NOTIFY is what a presence server sends to a subscriber to notify the state > of > a subscribed user. > > XLite allos two way for presence: > > - Client to Client: In this way (the default one !!!!) XLite is a presence > client and PRESENCE SERVER (so it manages also NOTIFY's as presence > server). > In this way there is no need of a presence server. > > - Presence Agent: This mode expects that the SIP proxy allows SUBSCRIBE > and > PUBLISH events, so the proxy is also a presence server (or teh proxy > forward > those messages to a presence server). In this way the presence server > sends > NOTIFY to the clients and receive PUBLISH and SUBSCRIBE from them. > > > > I'm curious to know where this is defined in standard. Please tell me if > > there is any RFC or reference document talking about this. > > There are a lot: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3265 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3856 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3863 > > > > Regards. > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
