I agree with Robert.

The following is a more direct answer to your specific question.

Brett Tate wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Concerning rfc3261 and rfc4485 usage of gen-value and quoted-string, are
> the quotes considered part of the value during use?  
> 
> Since I didn't notice a good example within rfc3261, I'll ask more
> specifically concerning the forbidden draft-levy-sip-diversion. :)
> 
> diversion-reason = "reason" "=" ( ... | "deflection" | ... | token |
> quoted-string )
> 
> Notice that unquoted deflection is a reason value and that quoted-string
> is also possible.  If a device uselessly or erroneously sends
> reason="deflection" instead of reason=deflection does "deflection" have
> the same meaning as deflection?  More specifically if a device sends
> reason="deflection", are the quotes considered an error or useless based
> upon the rfc4485, rfc3261, and ABNF?  

In the above, "deflection" in the *rule* means that the rule will match 
a sequence of characters that match the string "deflection" (without the 
quotes) is a case insensitive way. The quoted-string part of the rule 
will match "deflection" *with* the quotes.

So the rule will match a message containing deflection with or without 
quotes. I don't have the draft in front of me, so I don't know if there 
is a semantic difference between the two.

It is really in the realm of the draft that includes the BNF to say what 
these mean.

        Paul

> If the answer mentioned within an rfc (excluding strict upon send and
> lenient upon receive paradigm), please also provide indicate the
> reference.
> 
> Concerning rfc3261's display-name, some vendors render the quotes to
> user and others don't.  I didn't notice rfc3261 indicating to de-quote
> the display-name.  
> 
> Concerning auth stuff like realm, the rfc explicitly indicates when
> de-quote is needed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brett
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to