Hello,
There is an issue that I find not clear in RFC 4745: whether both
//rule/actions and //rule/transformations nodes are both compulsory in a
privacy preferences document.
The XML Schema says:
...
<!-- //rule/actions or //rule/transformations -->
<xs:complexType name="extensibleType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:restriction base="xs:anyType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
And in the document there are many statements like these:
A 'rule' has a 'conditions', an 'actions', and a
'transformations' part.
A rule consists of three parts:
conditions (see Section 7), actions (see Section 8), and
transformations (see Section 9).
I will appreciate if you could clear this out.
Regards,
Anca Vamanu
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
