Amit - can you describe what the purpose of doing it would be for? That may help find a solution to your problem. (and I assume you meant RFC 3680 ;) There are some non-standard tricks people use to do this, depending on what you need it for.
-hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sip- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 9:50 AM > To: Amit P. Ahuja > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Forcing Clients/Phone to re REGISTER prior > to "Expires" timeout > > > > Amit P. Ahuja wrote: > > Hello List Members, > > Using only methods described in RFC3261 is there any way for a Sip > > Server to force a Client to re-REGISTER prior to the timeout period set > > during the REGISTER-200 OK transaction? I did see RFC3580 describing a > > procedure to Forcing Re-Authentication however I wanted to enquire > whether > > it can be done with 3261 only ? > > No. Using only 3261 mechanisms there is no way for the registrar to > communicate this desire to the UA. The next time the UA does send a > REGISTER the registrar may reduce the timeout. But until the UA sends > the REGISTER there is nothing the registrar can do. > > Paul > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Amit Ahuja > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
