El Wednesday 28 May 2008 15:51:07 Brett Tate escribió: > Prior to rfc3311 (UPDATE), INFO without body was commonly used to check > dialog state as alternative to using re-INVITE. Now that rfc3311 is > available, it is more commonly used. > > If Twinkle supports rfc2976, it must return 200 instead of 415 when INFO > contains no body. > > RFC 2976 section 2.2: > > "A 200 OK response MUST be sent by a UAS for an INFO request with no > message body if the INFO request was successfully received for an existing > call." > > "A 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist message MUST be sent by a UAS if > the INFO request does not match any existing call leg."
Thanks a lot for pointing that! I've already reported the bug to Twinkle developer, now I must do the same with Asterisk. Really thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
