Based on the RPID draft (believe its still a draft - no RFC) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sip-privacy-04.txt
The rpi-privacy parameter describes whether the identity information must be hidden from untrusted entities. There MAY be multiple rpi-privacy parameters in a Remote-Party-ID. If privacy is requested, it MUST be one or more of "full", "uri", or "name". The value "full" means that both the "display-name" and the "addr-spec" MUST be hidden. The values "name" and "uri" mean that the "display-name" or the "addr-spec" MUST be hidden respectively. So per the above, the SIP peer may only be requiring the addr-spec be hidden not necessarily caller id name - check with the peer to make sure that is what they want. Thanks Maulik -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rashid Shakil Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 8:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip-implementors] Privacy header for Anonymous calls(Remote-Party-ID Header) Hello, Folks just have a quick question. If I am receiving a caller ID hide/anonymous call what should be privacy header (part of Remote-Party-ID header) look like in the SIP peering environment. Should the privacy header is "privacy=full". One of my SIP Peer is sending "privacy=uri" for anonymous calls/caller ID hide calls and my question is it a correct format or do they have to send "privacy=full". I never noticed "uri" so far all the previous carriers I have worked with send "full" for caller ID hide calls and "off" for normal calls. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>;privacy=uri Anonymity: uri Regards, RS _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
