Valentin Nechayev wrote:
>>>>>> I??aki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it ""normal""? Why the hell does a softswitch require *anything* in
>> the "To" URI? (except the To_tag XD).
>
> Even if you found that this wasn't correctly detected, generally
> it is quite normal to check and use username in h_To as something
> another than username in RURI. It can be used, for example, to
> select specific DID number across the pool assigned to the
> customer specified in RURI (this is used e.g. in Sipura/Linksys
> SPA9000 as one possible form of such DID specification). See also
> ISUP specs and draft-yu-tel-url: they specify special "routing
> number" which also can be passed, in different tradition, in RURI
> (while final number is passed in h_To).
Yes, it isn't unusual to see that done. And it is BROKEN!
That algorithm breaks any time a call is forwarded. You must use a
separate contact address for each AOR you service in order to be able to
demux incoming calls to the proper AOR. OR, you need some other
mechanism, such a P-Called-Party-ID that IMS uses, to help you with that.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
