>>Is it valid? it's valid in that it's parseable but obviously it's not standard. And since it's different from "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]", it's unlikely it will have the desired effect.
>>does each SIP implementation choose its own hidden URI? All should use "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but it wouldn't surprise me if others used other non-standard anonymous uri's. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: 18 June 2008 12:21 To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip-implementors] "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is the correctway to hide the caller? Hi, RFC 3261 says that a UAC wanting to hide its identity should use a From like this: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it the unique correct way to do it? For example, when I receive a call from my carrier gateway (Nortel CS2K) with "Privacy: id" the From is: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it valid? does each SIP implementation choose its own hidden URI? Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
