El Miércoles, 18 de Junio de 2008, Attila Sipos escribió: > I can't answer why Nortel hasn't used "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > but I can say that a most vendors have some non-RFC'd behaviour. > > > This happens because: > 1. sometimes things are made-up before a standard has been fixed > 2. then the standard is published but non-standard behaviour > doesn't always get retro-fixed.
I understand, but I wonder why isn't it fixed in last releases of the Nortel CS2K software? > The question is how serious a problem is it for you? > What are the knock-on effects? It's not an important problem of course. The only I need to do in my proxy is changing [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the standar [EMAIL PROTECTED] I do it just to be as RFC compliant as possible. Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
