Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Wednesday 02 July 2008 18:10:36 Paul Kyzivat escribió:
>> But conventions could be established. Certainly it is tempting to
>> consider transforming
>>
>> tel:1234;phone-context=example.com
>> into sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> or sip:1234;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What is the last line?:
> sip:1234;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The username is:
> 1234;phone-context=example.com
>
> Well, it's a perfeclty valid userinfo in SIP ABNF grammar (I've tested it
> just
> now), but since there are no "userinfo" parameters the UAS receiving this URI
> will not match "1234" but the whole "1234;phone-context=example.com".
>
> Is really usable that "userinfo" in real life?
Well, I said I was imagining ways to transform one into another.
It may not be useful.
Maybe more sensible way is to use sip:example.com as a Route, and leave
the tel URI as is in the R-URI.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
