El Viernes, 4 de Julio de 2008, Kannaiyan Natesan escribió: > You must have stun in your client so that you will have NAT public > address filled instead of private address.
Yes, but I'm sure using STUN is not mandatory at all ;) > According to RFC whatever the client is performing is correct. I mean > responding to 192.168.0.100 So just a NAT issue then, ok. Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
