El Jueves, 24 de Julio de 2008, Nenad Milidrag escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I am pretty sure it is still useful in certain cases, for example, if you
> have a NAT and NAT device is not SIP aware.  Using rport/received together
> with you can get your public ip/port seen by the proxy and when
> reregistering provide your public ip/port to the proxy.  By keeping your
> connection to NAT device persistent incoming call from proxy should still
> be properly routed.  Also, in this case you should use symmetric sip.

So "received"/"rport" is just ueful in the UAS (a registrar in this case) the 
transport layer to inform the core, is it?

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to