RFC 3261 section 13.2.2.4 discusses the impacts of INVITE 2xx when a
dialog known because prior 1xx.

Paragraph 3 appears to conflict with paragraph 2 concerning updating the
route set.  Paragraph 2 indicates that the route set must be recomputed
per 12.2.1.2 (which updates the remote-target without discussing
record-route).  Paragraph 3 appears to indicate that the route set
should be impacted by 2xx record-route for backwards compatibility
reasons.

What should be the impacts of received INVITE 2xx's record-route upon
existing dialog switching to confirmed?

Thanks,
Brett

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to