El Viernes, 5 de Septiembre de 2008, Paul Kyzivat escribió: > The diversion draft expired long ago. > It is widely implemented, but should be considered proprietary. > It won't ever be standardized by the ietf. > It has been (loosely) replaced by the History-Info header.
Widely implemented but expired drafts that are replaced by other RFC's. This is a pain (IMHO). IETF usually seems to be obsessive respecting backwards compatibility (painful transaction mathing for RFC 2543 devices, stric/loose routing...) but sometimes there is a working solution widely implemented that is not accepted as RFC (RPID <-> PAI)? So now we have many SIP devices supporting RPID but not PAI. Also, how many SIP devices support "History-Info"? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
