> Question: > If the SCTP association is open, shall we forward the response to "Address > 2" even though "Address 1" (PRIMARY PATH) may be recovered?
> If the SCTP association is no longer open, shall we open a new association > towards "Address 2"? think so. Maybe a new connection with "Address 2" fails so the "sent-by" value would be inspected, RFC3263 performed on it and probably "Address 1" would result in that DNS operation. Anyway, it seems that SCTP offers some capabilities (IP redundancy in a single connection) that SIP can't not advantage of them. Am I wrong? This is: the transport layer knows about associations between IP:port and connections, but just it, it doesn't know about complex SCTP connections involving various IP's. Isn't there really a RFC defining a new SIP transport layer model for SCTP protocol? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
