El Miércoles, 17 de Septiembre de 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > I've got an Internet-Draft that describes the best way that we (the > sipX PBX project) have found to implement music-on-hold. I'd like > feedback from the implementor community.
Hi, it seems really interesting. Just a question: Why so strange parameter name in Contact?: +sip.rendering="no" Is it usual a parameter name begining with "+" and containing a dot "." in other parameters? Also, isn't there a better way to indicate that the UA is putting the call on hold? I mean in SIP headers, of course, since there is not SDP. Is the Contact header the best place to indicate it? (maybe yes, I just ask). Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
