I know that 125 µs relates to the sample period, which is however identical to 
the frame size in case of G.711 IMHO.
Could you provide your reference concerning the 5 ms definition?
 
Thanks, Albrecht
 


________________________________

        From: Aneesh Naik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Montag, 22. September 2008 14:45
        To: Schwarz Albrecht
        Cc: Sachin Rastogi; [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Should 'ptime' value be multiple of 5 
or 10
        
        
        125 µs is not the frame size of  G.711. It is the time sampling rate.  
        
        8000 samples in 1 sec. 
        1      sample   in 125 µs.
        
        Number of such samples are combined to form a frame of data.
        This frame size for G.711 is 5ms.
        
        Hope this clears your understanding.
        
        Thanks,
        Aneesh
        
        
        On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Schwarz Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
        

                > > The frame size for g.711 is 5ms
                
                
                G.711 has a frame size of 125 µs in my understanding.
                See ITU-T G.711.
                


                > -----Original Message-----
                > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
                > Behalf Of Sachin Rastogi
                > Sent: Montag, 22. September 2008 13:45
                > To: Aneesh Naik
                > Cc: [email protected]
                > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Should 'ptime' value be
                > multiple of 5 or 10
                >
                > Thanks Aneesh,Alex for quick reply.
                >
                >
                > Sachin
                >
                > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Aneesh Naik
                > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
                >
                > > Yes, as explained by alex the ptime depend on the frame 
size...
                > > The frame size for g.711 is 5ms, for g.729 is 10ms and for
                > g.723 it is
                > > 30 ms.
                > > So the ptime for 711 and 729 can be 10, 20, 30... and for
                > 723 it can
                > > be 30,60....
                > >
                > > -Aneesh
                > >
                > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Alex Balashov
                > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                > > >wrote:
                > >
                > > > There are no drafts or recommendations mandating that 
ptime be a
                > > > particular value because the desired packetisation 
duration is
                > > > closely related to the frame size and other
                > characteristics of particular codecs.
                > > >
                > > > However, almost no media gateway equipment out there will 
support
                > > > anything other than the usual 10-30 ms for the usual 
suspects -
                > > > G.711u/A, G.729A, etc.
                > > >
                > > > There are certain recommendations or mandates for ptime
                > values based
                > > > on particular codecs.  For instance, 20 ms is recommended
                > when using
                > > > Speex
                > > > 
(http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node14.html):
                > > >
                > > > ---
                > > >
                > > > 4.1.1.  Registration of media type audio/speex
                > > >
                > > >    Media type name: audio
                > > >
                > > >    Media subtype name: speex
                > > >
                > > >    Required parameters:
                > > >
                > > >    None
                > > >
                > > >    Optional parameters:
                > > >
                > > >       ptime: see RFC 4566.  SHOULD be a multiple of 20 
msec.
                > > >
                > > >       maxptime: see RFC 4566.  SHOULD be a multiple of 20 
msec.
                > > >
                > > >
                > > >
                > > > Sachin Rastogi wrote:
                > > >
                > > > > Hi All,
                > > > > Is there any rfc/draft or recommendation which suggests
                > that 'ptime'
                > > > > value should multiple of 5 or 10? Can I use 'ptime'
                > value as 11 or
                > > > > 12
                > > or
                > > > 18
                > > > > or 19?
                > > > >
                > > > >
                > > > >
                > > > > Thanks
                > > > > Sachin Rastogi
                > > > > _______________________________________________
                > > > > Sip-implementors mailing list
                > > > > [email protected]
                > > > >
                > 
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
                > > >
                > > >
                > > > --
                > > > Alex Balashov
                > > > Evariste Systems
                > > > Web    : http://www.evaristesys.com/
                > > > Tel    : (+1) (678) 954-0670
                > > > Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
                > > > Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
                > > > _______________________________________________
                > > > Sip-implementors mailing list
                > > > [email protected]
                > > > 
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
                > > >
                > >
                > >
                > >
                > > --
                > > Aneesh
                > >  _______________________________________________
                > > Sip-implementors mailing list
                > > [email protected]
                > > 
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
                > >
                > _______________________________________________
                > Sip-implementors mailing list
                > [email protected]
                > 
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
                >
                




        -- 
        Aneesh
        

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to