Hi,

Rockson's stance that UAS's sending of 2xx response without refresher
is invalid is corroborated by evidence from the RFC.

The solution approach suggesting the continuation of the dialog
despite receiving a 200 OK without refresher parameter seems to
contradict with the RFC.
Kindly comment.

Thank You.

Regards,
Suganya


On 10/9/08, Anuradha Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since the UAS supports timer and it receives a positive response with
> Session Expires information, therefore it can continue the dialog .Start the
> session timer as per the value received in the Session expires header in the
> response and assume the refresher as UAC ie itself.
>
> Regards
>
> Anuradha Gupta
> (Aricent)
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Govardhana
> Sankanna Nagendraprasad
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] UAC's behavior upon receiving 200 OK for
> INVITEwithout Refresher
>
> Hi All,
>
>             I have a query in Session timer functionality, UAC sends an
> invite without Session-Expires Header but supports timer,
> upon receiving a 200 OK response to this with Session-Expires header without
> refresher parameter, what should be the behavior
> of UAC. Whether UAC should establish the Call by sending ACK or establish
> and terminate immediately or  UAC should Ignore
> such responses as refresher parameter is mandatry in the 200 ok response.
>
> Regards,
> Govardhan
>
>
> ________________________________
> "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain
> privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used
> for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received
> this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
> prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this
> message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from
> the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from
> virus."
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
> "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain
> privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used
> for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received
> this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
> prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this
> message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from
> the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from
> virus."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to