2008/10/13 Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You say you don't consider the connection reuse draft. But you should, > because its intent is to clarify behavior that is unclear in 3261.
Well, what I want to know is why all the SIP TCP phones I've tryed behind NAT allow receiving requests via the TCP connection open for the registration. Those phones don't implement that draft. Maybe this is an """estandar""" way to solve NAT using TCP? > Your first case seems inappropriate because the register request in general > does not require that the source be coincident with the contact that is > registered. Of course, the REGISTER Contact could be: Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;transport=tcp> and the UA could send this REGISTER from 192.168.1.58:23456. This is, the IP in REGISTER Contact is never the REGISTER originin ip:port. This is logical since a SIP TCP clients sends requests from a port different than the listening port (5060).ç Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
