If you make use of TLS (for send / receive of SIP messages) then you can choose sips: otherwise you can choose sip:. I do not think for presence one particular scheme should be used, it can be either of two "sip:" or "sips:".
Kamal Cisco, Bangalore India -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 2:03 AM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Does AoR include the protocol (SIP/SIPS)? El Miércoles, 22 de Octubre de 2008, Michael Procter escribió: > Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > Hi, does an AoR also include the protocol type? if that, why? > So, an AoR includes the 'sip:' or 'sips:' portion, which is known as > the 'scheme' according to RFC3986. Is this what you mean by 'protocol type'? Thanks for pointing it. Just a question: if I want to subscribe to the presence of a user "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]", why should I choose between sip: and sips: in the protocol of the URI in the "To:" header? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
