Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Viernes, 24 de Octubre de 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: >> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 >> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:15060 >> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:25060 >> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:35060 >> >> In that case, the request-URI of the REGISTER needs to contain the >> proper port number. > > Well, not totally needed. A UA could construct a REGISTER like this: > > REGISTER sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 > > and sent it to host:15060. > > For example Twinkle does it if you set the registrar in a port different than > 5060.
So, is it definitively needed or not? If the transport-layer destination port of the request is non-canonical, should the port appear in the RURI? -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors