2008/11/10 Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oh, sorry. I haven't been paying much attention to BLA. I didn't realize it > covered this case. (I was thinking it only covered multiple "extensions" > with same identity. But now that I look I see it does cover the > boss/secretary case as well.
I've read and re-read BLA draft and it seems really really complex, but I wonder why it's not enought with 3rd Party Registration, RFC 4235 (INVITE package subscription) and REFER with "replaces" in order to get the same behaviour. Perhaps somebofy could explain me the beneficts of using BLA. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
