El Jueves, 27 de Noviembre de 2008, Michael Procter escribió: > Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > Hi, I've read Session Timers RFC but it's a bit confusing for me. I've a > > basic doubt: > > > > alice proxy bob > > > > - alice calls bob. > > - proxy doesn't implement SessionTimers (in the way a proxy could > > implement it). > > - bob implements SessionTimers and want to use them. > > > > In this scenario, can SessionTimers work? Thanks. > > All session timers do is provide a mechanism to prompt periodic session > refreshes (either by reINVITE or UPDATE). If a UA wishes to perform a > session refresh anyway, it is free to do so, regardless of any indicated > 'session timer' support by any other node. > > In your scenario, Bob may send a reINVITE whenever Bob feels the need. > As can Alice, even though Alice doesn't support session timers. The > only node unable to cause session refreshes is your proxy, and the point > behind RFC4028 is to allow proxies to influence the refreshes. > > Hope this helps,
Sure, thanks for clarification. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
