Well, empty authorisation values mean invalid authorisation credentials, so why not? Either that or 500 Internal Server Error or 400 Bad Request.
ROHIT CHAUDHARY wrote: > Is sending a 403 Forbiddden jusitfied for this case? > > > --- On Fri, 12/12/08, Brett Tate <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Brett Tate <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Empty Proxy-Authorization Header > To: "Maxim Sobolev" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Friday, 12 December, 2008, 1:53 AM > >>> What should be a response to an INVITE with >>> an empty Proxy-Authorization header (i.e. >>> with no value) ? >> 400 Bad Request, just like any other empty >> header with no value IMHO. Header value is >> not optional. > > I agree that the header value is not optional within > Proxy-Authorization. However an empty header value is valid within some > headers such as Supported. > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to > http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
