Hi Laurent,

Thank you for indicating the recommendations in OMA. Having only one and 
fixed parameter is viable to implement and we will probably go for this.

regards,
Anca

Laurent ETIEMBLE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For example, OMA specifically recommends the use of parameter in Service 
> URI for Presence Lists. Here is the quote from 
> "OMA-WP-PRS_1_1_Implementation_Guidelines", Para 5.5.1:
>
> -----
> It is RECOMMENDED that:
> · the Service-URI-Template for Presence Lists have the following structure:
> <xui>;pres-list=<id>
> where the <xui> and <id> substitution tags are described in [XDM_Core] 
> "Provisioned XDMC Parameters".
>
> The reasons for the recommendation include:
> · effective use of resources (e.g. access network bandwidth), since the 
> recommended Service-URI-Template makes it
> easier for the XDMC to generate a globally unique Service URI that is 
> accepted by the RLS XDMS; and
> · simplification for the SIP/IP Core network to recognize the Service 
> URI as a Presence List (e.g. to optimize routing
> of Presence List subscriptions).
>
> An example of a Service URI conforming to the recommended 
> Service-URI-Template is as follows:
> sip:[email protected];pres-list=list-a
> -----
>
> If the RLS server don't want parameters, it can use the Service Uri 
> negotiation with a 409 response containing the desired Uri to use.
>
> Regards, Laurent Etiemble.
>
> Dale Worley wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 18:06 +0200, Anca Vamanu wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> It is not clear from here what part of the R-URI identifies the target 
>>> and whether parameters should also be used.
>>>     
>>>       
>> You are correct -- none of the RFCs specify rigidly how the request-URI
>> identifies the "resource" in question.  Part of the overall system
>> design is deciding on how request-URIs are mapped into the actual
>> resources of the UASs.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.18/1849 - Release Date: 15/12/2008 
>> 09:01
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to