Rockson Li (zhengyli) wrote: > I agree with Maxim here. > If dialog terminates before transaction, RFC3261 does not say clearly > if UA need destroy those transactions explicitly or let them complete > their lifecycle. > I think it's up to implementation.
That's not exactly my view. I think the UA shall always let transaction to complete (or timeout) despite the fact that associated with that transaction dialog might have been finished already. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com MSN: [email protected] Skype: SippySoft _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
