Dale Worley wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> We have come over to a device that generates "strange" SDP. Basically, >> it splits the same media description into two separate media section. As >> a result our software considers it as two separate streams, not as one >> which it apparently is. >> >> To me, it seems like the format is invalid, however I cannot find any >> direct prohibition in the RFC 2327. What do people think: is it allowed? > > I is *allowed*, but as you think, it means that there are two separate > media streams (both of which are to be sent to port 5010. If the UA > that is generating the SDP does not intend to specify two separate media > streams, the UA is behaving incorrectly.
Of course it does not. What's the point in having two separate audio media streams in two different codecs sent to the same port? Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com MSN: [email protected] Skype: SippySoft _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
