RFC wont restrict a user from not sending SDP in 487 and even if he does that it wont be useful. Yes, you can send SDP in 487.
-Somesh -----Original Message----- From: Alex Balashov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 4:37 PM To: Somesh S. Shanbhag Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP payload in 487. I understand that it doesn't really serve any purpose. Should it be there at all? Somesh S. Shanbhag wrote: > 487 Request Terminated must be for INVITE transaction. > and since the transaction was not successful, even if the SDP is present > we need to ignore it. > > -Somesh > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alex Balashov > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 4:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] SDP payload in 487. > > I am getting an SDP payload in a 487 Request Terminated message in > response to a CANCEL (first a 200 OK, then a 487). > > Is this allowed? > -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
