It is a known issue. http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=765
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rockson Li > (zhengyli) > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:38 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: Regarding Refer-To header > > Harbhanu, > > I agree with you, addr-spec must be used as well for Refer-To. > However, looks like RFC3515 does not state this explicitly. > > Regards, > -Rockson > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > harbhanu > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 2:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] FW: Regarding Refer-To header > > Hi, > > For all the headers defined in 3261, which are obtained from ( name-addr > / addr-spec ), we have a rules saying that the values > > must be wrapped with '<' and '>', incase addr-spec contains any of > comma, semi-colon or question mark. > > > > For example, statement fro 'From' header field: > > "Even if the "display-name" is empty, the "name-addr" form MUST be > used if the "addr-spec" > > contains a comma, question mark, or semicolon. Syntax issues are > discussed in Section 7.3.1." > > > > So, does the value for "Refer-To" also follows same normative rule, as > it's also obtained from name-addr / addr-spec ?? > > I couldn't find any normative statement in rfc-3515 for this. Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Harbhanu > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
