Andrea Rizzi wrote:
> Sorry, I reported the wrong RFC number, the right one is 3398 "SIP-ISUP
> mapping". I beg your pardon
OK. That is also old - it predates 3966 by a couple of years, but it was
incorrect even with respect to RFC 2806, which it referenced for the
definition of the tel URL syntax.
Thanks,
Paul
> Andrea
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: mercoledì 21 gennaio 2009 17.29
> To: Andrea Rizzi
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] user=phone usage in SIP trunking gateways
>
>
>
> Andrea Rizzi wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, RFC3966, Section 12 says:
>>
>> "When the '+' sign is not present, but a telephone number is
>>
>> represented by the user portion of the URI, the SIP URI SHOULD
>>
>> contain the optional ';user=phone' parameter; e.g.,
>>
>> To: sip:[email protected];user=phone"
>
> I don't find that in 3966. I do find that language in section 2 of
> draft-jfp-sip-isup-header-00.txt. (It took some doing to find that.)
> That is an ancient expired draft. Perhaps that text made it into some
> other document. But its wrong.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
