2009/2/3 Johansson Olle E <[email protected]>:
>> PD: I would also consider "tel" URI:
>>
>>        Request-URI    =  SIP-URI / SIPS-URI / TEL-URI / absoluteURI
>>
>
> I would add an IM: uri that needs to be resolved one more layer before
> sending it to a higher level...

Humm, IM and PRES uris seem to have no success, do they have? Very
cool concepts but... feasible?

Thanks.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to