Hello, Probably this is the text you are looking for :
RFC3216 20.10 " Even if the "display-name" is empty, the "name-addr" form MUST be used if the "addr-spec" contains a comma, semicolon, or question mark. " Best regards, Ben. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: vrijdag 6 februari 2009 10:57 To: SIP Implementors Mailing list Subject: [Sip-implementors] Is valid ";" into addr-spec without using name-addr ? Hi, I "think" that the symbol ";" is no valid into addr-spec if it is not enclosed into a name-adrr (< ... >), this is, the following is invalid: From: sip:user;[email protected];header-param=value Since the SIP userinfo part contains ";", the whole URI would be enclosed into name-addr, so the valid form would be: From: <sip:user;[email protected]>;header-param=value The parser I'm building has exactly this behaviour, this is: the first case is parsed as invalid while the second is valid. Could I get a confirmation on it? I remember this was especified in some part of RFC3261 but I don't find it now. Thanks a lot. PD: In case I'm right, is there any other symbol valid into name-addr but invalid into addr-spec? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
