On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 23:42 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Martes, 17 de Febrero de 2009, Dale Worley escribió: > > On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 22:28 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > > This is yet another place in the BNF where what needs to be done is > > determined by the parameter name. This case is more complex than usual, > > in that the parameter name determines whether it is an accept-param (and > > binds to media-range as part of accept-range), or an m-parameter (and > > binds to "m-type SLASH m-subtype" as part of media-range. > > The problem is that both 'accept-param' and 'm-parameter' accept any custom > parameter (token EQUAL token).
But in any particular implementation, there will be no token that is an understood custom parameter for both accept-param and m-parameter. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
