Sec 10.3 Point #7 specifies the below:
"If the Call-ID value in the existing binding differs from the
Call-ID value in the request, the binding MUST be removed if
the expiration time is zero and updated otherwise."
Does this mean that the Register requests from same UA can have different
Call-IDs as long as the CSeq values are not the same?
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Dale Worley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:25 -0800, cool goose wrote:
> > What about the Call-ID? If the same UA sends the REGISTER requests
> > with different cal-IDs, what would be the ideal response from the
> > registrar? I know that RFC 3261 prohibits from doing this. If UA fails
> > to use the same Call-ID, how will it effect the registrar in ordering
> > the requests?
>
> See RFC 3261 section 10.3. The rules are messy, but they give the
> results one would want to get.
>
> Dale
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
