See here some hard numbers (thanks to Robert):
https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary
<snap>
For DNS we had support for:
Full RFC3263 : 65% (continuing to climb)
SRV only : 15%
A records only : 13%
no DNS support : 7%
</snap>
So 65% with NAPTR and 80% with SRV.....
Regards,
Bogdan
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/2/26 Klaus Darilion <[email protected]>:
>
>>> RFC 3263 (Locating SIP Servers) is really complex, NAPTR is really
>>> complex, and it's not needed in 99% of current SIP deployments, so
>>> vendors don't implement it. If a SIP provider whises to use NAPTR
>>> records then all its clients should implement it in their SIP phones
>>> (obviously this is unfeasible for no
>>>
>> I tend to disagree. I always hate to configure stuff like outbound proxy and
>> protocol in a SIP client. If all client supports NAPTRs then it would be
>> sufficient to configure in your client only the AoR and password.
>>
>
> Sure, but for that, vendors must implement RFC 3263 properly in the
> phones. Do they?
>
>
>
>> And people which understand SIP should be able to understand DNS too.
>>
>
> Sure.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
