2009/3/3 sarvpriya <[email protected]>: > Hello Inaki, > Thanks very much for such a fast reply. > i have few more ques. > 1) if for sending UDP msgs, i am using sendto, then I will not receive any > transport error. Thus what should I do say I am UAS > UAC UAS > Invite > ------------> > 2/3/4/5xx > <------------ > Now I dnt receive any ACK. > should I try alternate( i guess NO) and if yes den how do I maintain my > timers.
This is "more" or ***less*** explained in RFC 3261 section 18.2.2: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-18.2.2 It's really a pain and most of the implementations don't try failover for responses (they will never work in NAT is present, for example). > 2) 3) similarly while sending in dialog request say info, if I dnt get reply > to >> info, then shud i contact alternate ip addresses? I already explaned in my previous mail that an in-dialog request cannot have alternative destination addresses, please re-read it. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
