The registrar should support legacy 2543 endpoints (i.e. phones). It only has to do this on the server transaction because presumably it would never generate a request w/o a branch id. Its not that hard.
Cheers, (-:bob -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] What should be the response from a Registrar if the REGISTER request via header field has no "branch" parameter El Miércoles, 11 de Marzo de 2009, cool goose escribió: > What do you guys think that a registrar should respond for a REGISTER > request whose Via header field has no "branch" parameter. Reject it with "403 Please upgrade you terrible and out-of-date SIP stack". Mantaining backward compatibility should end someday. Any SIP stack based on RFC 2543 should dissapear ASAP. Just my opinion. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
